In “Spontaneous Activity in Education” Dr. Montessori gives a full analysis of the difference between imagination and fantasy. For many of us we tend to equate one with the other. And our observation of children seems to indicate that children have rather fanciful imaginations – again confusing the terms. Her emphasis on not telling “fairy” tales to young children seems overly strict and kill joyous. Yet, her reasoning has great insight.
Imagination has its basis in reality. Fantasy is outside of reality – talking cats, flying dogs etc. “The true basis of the imagination is reality.” “To develop the imagination it is necessary for everyone first of all to put himself in contact with reality.”
“When man loses himself in mere speculations, his environment will remain unchanged, but when imagination starts from contact with reality, thought begins to construct works by means of which the external world becomes transformed”
Imagination changes things – fantasy does not.
So why are fairy tales (cartoons?) to be discouraged for young children? Because they do not reflect reality. But we don’t want to discourage imagination people will say because imagination is closely aligned with creativity and art.
“Yet no one can say that man creates artistic products out of nothing. What is called creation is in reality a composition, a construction raised upon a primitive material of the mind, which must be collected by means of the senses.”
You cannot draw a house unless you know what a house looks like. You cannot put words together to create a poem or a story unless you know what the words mean. “No genius has ever been able to create absolutely new.” “It is necessary that every artist should be an observer … in order to develop the imagination it is necessary for every one first of all to put himself in contact with reality.” “The immortal art of Greece was above all an art based on observation.” And Dr. Montessori goes on to say, “The more perfect the approximation to truth, the more perfect is art.”
So what makes a poem, a play, a picture or a story “art”? Part of it, naturally, is the aesthetics. But the other part (and this is where great art comes in) is that you don’t “see” the art because the art is swallowed up by truth. What makes a novel classic? Is that it continues to speak truth across time and space. Have you ever watched a second rate movie where the dialogue didn’t ring “true” or the action was implausible? Real art brings us to truth. Again, imagination is based on reality. And the training for imagination is cultivated by observation. St. Paul writing to the Philippians (4:8) says “Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable – if anything is excellent or praiseworthy – think about such things.” Is this not a case for observation and exercising imagination to reach this goal of truth?